Beethoven was a composer with whose music Arrau was particularly
associated, and he could trace his illustrious musical ancestry
back via his teacher Martin Krause, himself a pupil of Liszt, and
Czerny to Beethoven himself.
Arrau recorded the Diabelli Variations for American Decca in
1952, and he made this second in 1985, during the
period of his projected digital of Beethoven s piano
sonatas. This later performance allows us to hear Arrau s
incomparably full and rich sound to glorious effect, with a
transparency that permits every strand in the texture to be
heard, displaying Arrau s polyphonic gift but without sacrificing
the beauty of sonority which was such a feature of his playing.
Some of the tempi may appear slower than before, the rubati
grander, but actually the overall durations of the two
performances are remarkably similar.
In Arrau s hands these variations cover almost every available
mood and style, their characters ranging from serious or profound
(Nos.14 and 20) to the scintillating or humorous (Nos.10 and 22),
culminating in the huge climax of the knotty fugue (No.32) and
Beethoven s masterstroke the ethereal final minuet, which here
seems to hark back to the transfigured ending of Beethoven s last
piano sonata.
Neville Cardus once called Arrau s performances of Chopin Chopin
plus, a reflection of the pianist s unconventional approach to
that composer s music. Indeed, some of Arrau s Chopin s
violate conventional understanding of the composer. What
distinguishes Arrau s approach is his scrupulous adherence to the
letter of the score and the way he positively eschews technical
display, preferring to emphasise the strenuous heroism of the
music and imbuing it with the breadth and deep seriousness of
purpose he brought to everything he played. Arrau loathed the way
some pianists used Chopin s music as a vehicle for technical
display, and for what he called personal elegance. There is of
course elegance in Chopin s music, and in the most marvellous
sense of the word. But it s only one element. The fact that he
was and he didn t have very much physical strength doesn t
mean that others should imitate that. His music is much bigger.
In Arrau s hands the Chopin waltzes receive the most detailed and
exhaustive , full of richness and delicacy as well as
drama, charm and an underlying sense of melancholy. These are
performances that command concentrated listening, otherwise the
, grandeur and detailing of Arrau s interpretations are
likely to pass unnoticed.
There have surely been no grander, nobler performances of Liszt s
two concertos than these, which Arrau made in 1979 with Sir Colin
Davis and the London Symphony Orchestra. Davis recalled that
Arrau managed to make the music grow logically from one thing to
another, so that one feels the unity that is built into the
concertos in a most unusual and original way. The textures too
are extraordinary when they re played with the kind of Mozartian
clarity which Arrau brings to that music. This is enhanced by the
fine in which the piano and orchestra are integrated in
a realistic perspective, allowing the complex textual detail to
be heard to great effect.
Arrau studied with Liszt s pupil Martin Krause and throughout his
career his devotion to Liszt was extraordinary, his performances
elevating the music to a stature achieved by few others.
Divination was one of Arrau s favourite words and his playing of
Liszt surely deserves the adjective divinatory, realising the
extreme sensuousness, nobility, tragedy even, beyond the frequent
cascades of notes. Arrau s Liszt is remarkable for its depth and
spaciousness and what his pupil Garrick Ohlsson called His
extreme, unabashed, unembarrassed passion.